In the midst of an ongoing war between Twitch and its streamers, tensions have escalated as content creators demand improved monetization options and a more equitable revenue-sharing model. The recently launched partner+ program, which provides a 70/30 revenue split to only 2.5% of streamers, has sparked further discontent. Adding fuel to the fire, Twitch’s newfound rival is offering a generous 95/5 cut across the board, intensifying the debate.


Amidst the conflict, comments made by Twitch CEO Dan Clancy during a recent Twitch Podcast have drawn significant backlash from both streamers and viewers. The controversial statement, “We give you your stage,” has been met with scorn and criticism, triggering a wave of negative sentiment towards the platform.

I think there are differences across the board, we have the Prime Sub benefit which is a meaningful benefit for many of our creators. Our focus is doing what we can to help our creators. Given our need to run this as a sustainable business, we focus a lot on streamers. One thing that I often talk about is how we give you your stage and this is all we do. This is all we focus on. And we think that benefits you in terms of the community experience that it creates on your channel that allows you to engage with your audience to retain and keep that audience. That’s what we focus on to try and offer you the best streaming experience.

One disillusioned commentator expressed frustration by comparing Twitch to successful tech giant Apple, emphasizing the importance of creativity and presentation. They accused the Twitch CEO of lacking innovation and failing to conceal the platform’s stagnation.

Twitch’s practices are intrusive in nature, frequent and unavoidable advertisements that often disrupt the viewing experience. There is a disconnection between the platform’s actions and the satisfaction of its user base.

Twitch generously “giving” streamers their stage is a sentiment that’s unfounded and disconnected from the reality faced by content creators. The lack of appreciation for Twitch’s claims is evident.

The CEO is seemingly disconnected from the world of live streaming. One can argue that the streamers themselves provide viewers, generate ad revenue, and essentially build the stage upon which Twitch operates.

The CEO’s comment about providing the stage is a clear indication that the platform had no intention of altering its current payout structure.

As the war between Twitch and its streamers rages on, the dissatisfaction expressed by the platform’s community continues to grow. With a rival platform offering significantly more favorable revenue-sharing terms, pressure is mounting for Twitch to reevaluate its monetization strategies and address the concerns of its creators.

It remains to be seen how Twitch will respond to the overwhelmingly negative sentiment and demands for fairer compensation. The future of the platform may depend on its ability to adapt and meet the evolving needs of its streaming community, lest it risks losing its most valuable asset—its content creators.